Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quiara Vasquez's avatar

The thing that I find so, sooo weird about the sexlessness of modern IP-driven sci-fi is that like... what, 50%? of the handmaidens of the genre are guys who became famous around Y2k for making sexy teen soaps for the WB. (J.J. Abrams and Matt Reeves, Kevin Williamson arguably, Greg Berlanti for sure, and also maybe that guy from "Roseanne," um, Josh Wharton?...)

A lot of other aspects of those films (the bad and the occasional good) can be explained as "they're TV guys working under TV constraints," but the sexlessness is just bizarre given that context.

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

At first I thought you were giving this film more attention and critical thought than it deserves, but you've convinced me that there were tiny fragments of genius there. Could the director's cut be as much an improvement upon the initial release as Blade Runner's was? I'm not optimistic, to be honest. It sounds like Snyder was given carte blanche here; he wasn't shackled by studio executive philistines. And a lot of weird, nonconventional stuff DID make it into the initial release. My guess is that Snyder's ambition reached beyond his artistic ability/experience

Do you know if the novelization expounds on the Freudian life drive vs death drive themes at all? Because if there is something "there" there, I think Snyder would have made sure it got into the novelization

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts